Interview
My friend Adam Robinson has interviewed me. It starts off with questions about Zizek and Theology, then gets more general.
June 15, 2009 - Posted by Adam Kotsko | Zizek and Theology
9 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Recent Comments
- Guido Nius on Weekly Confessional: Stolen Finish
- Josh K-sky on Weekly Confessional: Good Dog
- mattintoledo on Weekly Confessional: Good Dog
- mattintoledo on Weekly Confessional: Social cocoon
- The Sunday Tunnel: Mother Makes a Cake « The Weblog on The Sunday Tunnel: No Light, No Tunnel
- The Sunday Tunnel: No Light, No Tunnel « The Weblog on The Sunday Tunnel: Mother Makes a Cake
- The Sunday Tunnel: about This world and the Other « The Weblog on The Sunday Tunnel: Mother Makes a Cake
- The Sunday Tunnel: Mother Makes a Cake « The Weblog on The Sunday Tunnel: about This world and the Other
- Josh K-sky on Weekly Confessional: Social cocoon
- Josh K-sky on Weekly Confessional: Not a gambling problem, but my problem with gambling
-
Recent Posts
- Philosophy according to JoB: objectives
- Weekly Confessional: Stolen Finish
- Sunday Stories: Gass if
- Weekly Confessional: Good Dog
- The Sunday Tunnel: No Light, No Tunnel
- The Sunday Tunnel: Mother Makes a Cake
- Weekly Confessional: Social cocoon
- The Sunday Tunnel: about This world and the Other
- Weekly Confessional: Not a gambling problem, but my problem with gambling
- The Sunday Tunnel: where it gets political
Categories
- 2666
- academia
- Awkwardness (the book)
- Blagojevich
- books
- bookstores
- boredom
- Chicago
- comic books!!!
- David Foster Wallace
- Death Notice
- dreams
- economics
- family values
- Fernando Pessoa
- film
- Friday Afternoon Confessional
- Fundraising
- housekeeping
- IMs
- innovative technologies that shape our lives
- insomnia
- instant messaging
- language
- language acquisition
- life of the mind
- media
- meta
- Monday Movies
- moving
- Music
- observational humor
- politics
- Pre-Wordpress Posts
- public transit
- race
- religion
- Roman Empire
- shameless self-promotion
- Small Talk About the Weather
- Solidarity
- Spoiler Alert Thursdays
- squalor
- Sunday Stories
- syntax
- teaching
- television
- the science of dating
- Thursday Take Down
- torture
- Tuesday Hatred
- Tuesday Quought
- Valentine's Day
- waking up in a cold sweat
- Wednesday Food
- Wednesday Workshop
- Wittgenstein
- Zizek and Theology
Archives
Adam’s Shared Items- Red Line rehab plans announced
- Occupy and General Strike Links, Other Links, 11/2/11
- SHOW OF FORCE
- Inequality, Economic Stagnation and Product Innovation
- Halloween Costumes, Foreclosures, Creditors’ Bargains and how the 1% View Our Laws on Debt
- New Facebook Feature Allows User To Cancel Account
- Why Quan’s Got to Go
- A Softer World: 733
- “There is room where the fences used to be”
- The virtue of Philip Blond
- Fear, American Style: What the Anarchist and Libertarian Don’t Understand about the US
- Petition to Google: don't kill Google Reader
Our motto:
"Get a job -- and some human rights!"Closely-related sites
An und für sich: an academic blog covering philosophy, theology, literature, and politics Mammoth and Mastodon: a webcomic, updated regularlyBlog Stats
- 545,215 pageviews
Feeds et al.

Interesting interview. I was big into Bible Quizzing in high school. Won the national quote off thing…back when I was awesome.
What’s your fascination with it?
Comment by Chad | June 15, 2009
I was a participant in it all through junior high and high school. I’m not personally fascinated with it, I just notice that other people find it extremely weird — everything from the jump seats (rather than buzzers) to the bizarrely literalistic way questions are formulated (i.e., everything has to be backed up by a literal quote from the verse — you wouldn’t get a question even as general as, “How many times did Jesus visit Jerusalem according to the Gospel of John?”). Seriously, sit down and explain it to someone who’s never heard of it, and you’ll see what I mean.
Comment by Adam Kotsko | June 15, 2009
Oh I know it’s weird, and plenty of weird people involved. What was funny about my team was the extraordiary number of attractive girls we had. Other teams were smitten and distracted. The quizzers were not generally part of the cool crowd.
Comment by Chad | June 15, 2009
The only teams on Eastern Michigan District with attractive girls really, really sucked. The same pattern repeated itself at the regional level.
I was always really good in the EMD context, but not hardcore enough to do much at the Olivet level. The closest I ever got to progressing beyond that level was 11th place in the initial round — the 10th place person was the perennial guy from the Wisconsin district (which sucked and therefore included a hot girl), who had to choose that year to become all hardcore about it.
My proudest moment was when I “pre-jumped” and all the quizmaster had said was, “Situation question….” By some kind of miracle, I randomly chose the right situation and the right questions (of the type “who said it, to whom, and why,” etc.). That was one of the few rounds where I didn’t error out that year.
Comment by Adam Kotsko | June 15, 2009
Nice. I remember a similar situation when a kid pre-jumped a quote question and randomly guessed Philippians 4:8 and got it.
It sounds like your quizzes were a little bit different than ours. Our questions didn’t have conditions or anything. 20 questions, 4 of which were quote/finish a verse. The other 16 were simply, “Question number 5…question (no ‘test’ jumping after this)…When did Nicadomas see Jesus?” Or “According to 1 Corinthians 5:12, what did blah blah blah…” I was the quote specialist.
I met Eric and Leah this way…I was new to the church and joined the team right away. I wonder why Richard wasn’t involved. He was in that youth group and it seemed like it would’ve been right up his alley.
Comment by Chad | June 15, 2009
“Situation questions” were only introduced the last couple years I was in it — after your time, I assume. For most of my career, they were using the format you describe, and the “situation questions” were among the 16 non-memory verse questions. (I assume there was only one per round.)
Comment by Adam Kotsko | June 15, 2009
I mean once they were introduced, they still fit into the framework you describe.
Comment by Adam Kotsko | June 15, 2009
I’m not sure why I wasn’t involved. I actually don’t remember it being something that was advertised as something you could join up with. It was kind of just the thing you guys did. I know I probably would have been horrible at jump seats because I can’t sit still.
Comment by Richard McElroy | June 16, 2009
It’s a small world — I just ordered Zizek and Theology with some graduation money I was given. I thought your name looked familiar, but I didn’t know where to place it. When I googled it, I found your blog and just now figured out you graduated from CTS. The small world part of this is that I sat next to you at the graduation as one of the lowly D.Min. grads…I had just heard Zizek at the Religion and Postmodernism conference at Syracuse in April — if I would have known you were a Zizek scholar, I would have asked you questions all the way from CTS to Hyde Park Union Church…
Comment by Phil | June 16, 2009